Home > Momentum & Growth, Predicting MLM Growth > MLM Companies Experiencing Momentum

MLM Companies Experiencing Momentum

I’ve recently suggested there might be better ways of measuring the appeal of a network marketing company & their opportunity. Most new network marketing members I know make the decision to join a particular company based on emotion, typically fueled by questionable information. But when a distributor is looking for a new opportunity, shouldn’t they be most interested in a company’s momentum – their recent and ongoing growth?

Why Growth & Momentum?

If a distributor joins with a company whose market share is shrinking, they’ll find it increasingly difficult to win team members, make sales and otherwise succeed.

So, I decided to look at growth & momentum. Since no network marketing companies regularly publish audited revenue numbers, we can’t use those. Plus, revenue lags momentum in this industry so it would be a late indicator.

How to Measure MLM Growth & Momentum

I think the best indicators of most trends today are found in online data. Here’s why:

  1. Most people use the internet to research products & companies they are interested in.
  2. There are very reliable 3rd-party services that monitor website and search traffic over time.

Every online data source has some flaws, but intelligently combining reliable sources provided me with some interesting findings. I wanted to see which MLM companies are experiencing momentum built on long-term growth.

The Results

The results might surprise you. First the chart with companies in alphabetical order:

MLM Company Momentum Comparison

MLM Company Momentum Comparison

And here are the results sorted by rank:

MLM Nutritional Product Company Momentum Score
Xango 9.5
Vemma 9.0
Zrii 6.0
Agel 5.0
Shaklee 4.8
Max Intl. 3.8
Herbalife 2.0
USANA 1.3
Forever Living Products 0.3
Life Plus -1.0
Pharmanex -2.3
Tahitian Noni Intl. -2.3
MonaVie -3.0
Mannatech -4.8
Waiora -6.3

Methodology

First, to ensure I was comparing apples to apples, I had to focus my scope of companies to the largest segment in network marketing-namely those companies marketing primarily nutritional products. So I didn’t include those focused on technology or broad consumer product lines. I’ll try to find a good way to tackle those segments later. I chose 15 popular nutritional product MLMs.

I looked at website and search traffic growth over the past 3 months. You wouldn’t want to measure just 1 month since a lot can happen online to cause only a momentarily spike in a site’s traffic. But 3 months gives a good view of immediate trends = momentum.

Besides just immediate trends, it’s important to look at what companies are growing overall. A few companies I looked at were actually decreasing over the past year so their short-term growth looked more like an element of recovery than momentum building on long-term growth.

Reaching back to my past statistics training, I combined the 3 month and 1 year website traffic & search data for each of the 15 companies by standardizing their growth percentages and then giving a slightly higher weight to the 3 month score. I used data from the following services: Alexa, Compete Inc, and Google Trends.

Conclusion

I’ll admit, I was fairly surprised at the results. At the top you have some more established companies like Xango and Shaklee generating buzz and building momentum, next to, and sometimes above, newer companies like Vemma, Zrii and Agel. I wonder why.

Could it be new product launches, company marketing & support, the elusive “critical mass?” What do you think? Like any research, there is more to dig into here. Maybe I can expose the drivers if I look at search engine keywords, traffic patterns, product launch activity, etc.

Whatever the drivers happen to be, this seems to be the type of data I’d be relying on if I was considering joining an MLM company and building a successful network marketing business – partly because it’s the sort of market growth data that successful traditional businesses rely on when they launch into new markets.

FYI: Here is the full article on MLM Companies with Momentum with some revisions.

  • Share/Bookmark
  1. Er Björn
    October 21st, 2009 at 01:31 | #1

    This is interesting information. I would love to get more details about the formula you used. You’ve combined the 3 month and 1 year website traffic & search data for each of the 15 companies by standardizing their growth percentages and then giving a slightly higher weight to the 3 month scores. Are you willing to share the math?

  2. October 21st, 2009 at 01:40 | #2

    @Er Björn
    Hello Er. If you look at the sources I mention in the article, Google Trends, Alexa and Compete, you should be able to generally reconstruct what I did. There certainly is some subjectivity involved in deciding to weigh the 3 month traffic average more than the 1 year traffic & search data. So I equalized the 3 month & 1 year scores by using the growth percentages (instead of hard traffic or search numbers) and then gave 25% more weight to the most recent 3 months. If you do a similar analysis, please let me know how it turns out. Thanks.

  3. October 21st, 2009 at 09:00 | #3

    Hi,

    It is an interesting approach, but I am dubious how closely web-searches can be tied to the physical growth of a company. When people search for information about a company (and in this case an MLM) it could be for any number of reasons – not all of them positive.

    In the case of XanGo, I am not surprised at your results, but I suspect that the actual company size (distributor count) has been static over the past 12 months. While there has been an amazing amount of web-advertising due to a new product-line and expansion into Russia, a lot of former distributors have hung up their towels and moved on to other things.

    In the three months before Russia’s opening was officially announced, at least five independent websites, and countless blogs, dedicated to XanGo were created in Russia (but hosted in the USA) – I am sure this would have affected your numbers as well…

    Having said that, I found your article interesting, and I will be back again.

  4. October 29th, 2009 at 09:26 | #4

    @Peter Abolins
    Hi Peter. Those are good points. I appreciate your thoughtfulness. I think web searches and site visits are valid indicators of the attention the general public is showing for certain terms and companies. If a company, like your example of Xango, does a lot of web advertising that drives traffic to ancillary sites (like those in another country) I believe that traffic wouldn’t have shown up in my numbers. I didn’t look at traffic to all web properties of a particular company, just that traffic going to their primary URL. Additionally, a company typically cannot drive up the number of web searches containing their company or product name. To me, those numbers are reflective of people independently searching information.

    I do agree with your point that not all searching or site visits are positive. Some searches could be driven by curiosity for negative reasons. In a future analysis it might be interesting for me to look at search keywords that accompany the company or product keywords to see if they reflect a negative purpose.

  5. Mike
    October 29th, 2009 at 12:28 | #5

    Wow this list is WAY off! XANGO ranks 44 on the MLM TOP 500 Momentum Ranks. XOWii ranks #1

  6. October 29th, 2009 at 17:57 | #6

    @Mike
    Mike and I had an interesting email exchange when discussing his comment. I asked how the MLM Top 500 Momentum list is compiled and he replied with the reference. He also added:

    “Common sense right off the top would tell me that the list is off though – Xango has been out for many many years and there is no way that they have the most momentum built up. They are no where near many of the newer companies that have not only improved on “superfruit” products but improved the compensation plans as well.”

    Here’s my response:
    Are you sure you want to rely on information compiled as loosely and subjectively as the MLM Top 500 Momentum list claims to be: “…based on Internet research, company revenues, interviews, company conventions, company websites, direct selling magazines, and through our reporters.”? What does that actually mean?

    Speaking of common sense…while I’m not a proponent of any particular company, just because a company is established doesn’t mean they can’t be experiencing momentum. There is a difference between “generating” momentum and “experiencing” momentum. Of course a new company will be going through all sorts of launch activities, but if that doesn’t cause a lot of people to look into them…they aren’t experiencing momentum, they are simply “trying” to generate it.

    Momentum is also not automatically caused by a company having a new super-fruit concoction or compensation plan formulation. Remember the old adage, “if a tree falls in the forest and there’s no one around to hear it, does it make any sound?”

  7. Hassan
    November 6th, 2009 at 11:47 | #7

    Those are quite interesting comments that Mike made! While I too am not involved in this debate it never fails to amuse me how few people ever think before they speak (or type!). Wouldn’t it be better to first get your facts straight and then to be impressed and happy for Xango and hope that the positive feedback that the industry is getting from companies that are in momentum would transfer into more positive responses in your own business? I guess Mike has a long way to go before he will find any real success given his mentality of wanting to bring others down…rather than lifiting them up. Poverty mentality!

  8. November 19th, 2009 at 13:21 | #8

    THESE PEOPLE WITH A NEGATIVE OPINION ON XANGO. FOR ME XANGO IS THE BEST, THE COMPENSATION PLAN, IT MADE {edited} MILLIONAIRES IN {edited} YEARS. THERE IS NOTHING TO BE COMPARED WITH {a little more editing}!

  9. November 19th, 2009 at 16:49 | #9

    @margie cruz
    Margie,
    I appreciate your enthusiasm but I had to edit your comment a bit so this site remains a place for analysis and debate rather than selling. ;-) .

  1. October 19th, 2009 at 00:19 | #1